Sidoli, Nathan Camillo
Spring, 2013
Office hours: Thursday, 4th and 5th

SILS, 11-1416
x71-8371
[email protected]

Announcements

I will put announcements about the class in this space. Please check here periodically as the term progresses.

Apr 19: Note that in weeks 4 and 5 we will meet on with Prof. Boot's class on Fridays, May 10 and 17, in classroom 9-316, 5th period.

MI501
Seminar on Matter and
Information: Science Studies

Philosophy of Science

Course Description

Science studies covers a broad range of topics in the history, philosophy and sociology of the sciences wherever and whenever they have been practiced. Because of this scope, there is great diversity in the styles of scholarship practiced and the views about science put forward by scholars in the field. For these reasons, this seminar will be based around a particular theme each term.

In the 2013 Spring Term, we will be studying Philosophy of Science. In this course, we will try to address some of the most difficult questions about the nature of science. How are scientific facts produced? What makes the sciences different from other fields of intellectual activity? How do the sciences develop, change and progress? What does every educated person needs to know about the sciences?

We will begin with some classics in the field by authors such as Ludwig Fleck, Karl Popper and Thomas Kuhn. We will then study some special topics such as the role of observation and the philosophy of normative sciences, such as medicine and psychology, and Bayesianism and new theories of evidence. Finally, we will read The Golem by Harry Collins and Trevor Pinch, which discusses a number of interesting episodes in the history of science from a philosophical perspective.

Students taking this class will be introduced to the core theories of philosophy of science and develop new ways of thinking about the relationship between science, technology and society. Students are expected to do all of the readings, participate actively in classroom discussions, and write a final paper.

Required Texts

A number of papers will be available for download from this site.

  • Collins, H., Pinch, T., 1998. The Golem: What everyone should know about science. CUP: Cambridge. (Please order a copy of this book from a local bookstore or online bookseller.)
  • Suggested Texts

  • Godfrey-Smith, P., 2003. Theory and Reality. UofC Press: Chicago.
  • Rheinberger, H.-J., 2010. On Historicizing Epistemology. SUP: Stanford.
  • Grading:

    Participation 50%
    Final paper 50%

    General Format

    The class meets once a week for a seminar discussion. Attendance and participation in class are mandatory and graded. Each week, we will discuss a chapter or two from the text, and other topics of interest. Students are expected to do all the readings, participate actively in the discussions, submit a final paper and give an in class presentation on its contents.

    Final Paper

    Writing project, 3,000-5,000 words.

    The writing project will be done in two phases: (1) a topic proposal and bibliography, and (2) a final paper. You should come up with your own idea for a final project that is based on the works we are studying. The best kind of project will be on a subject in which you are personally interested.

    Once you have selected a topic, you should write up a short description of your project (100-300 words), which should be followed by a bibliography (5-10 items). The topic proposal is due at least two weeks before the final paper. Once this has been submitted and approved, you can begin work on your final paper.

    Please also read the general guidelines for written assignments.

    Discussion Topics, Readings and Assignments

    As you read through the readings, you should ask yourself the following questions:

      1. What is the overall point that the author is trying to make?
      2. What is the author’s argument? What evidence does the author use? What are the strong points of the argument, the weak points?
      3. Is the argument convincing? Why, or why not?
      4. Why would the author make this kind of argument? What is the broader context in which this is interesting?
    Week 1: Apr 10

    General Introduction

  • No reading.
  • Week 2: Apr 17

    What is a scientific fact? (I)

  • Reading: Ludwig Fleck, selection from Genesis and Development of a Scientific Fact, Chap. 4 (sections 1-3).
  • Suggested Reading: Thought Collectives and Thought Styles.
  • Week 3: Apr 24

    What is a scientific fact? (II)

  • Reading: Ludwig Fleck, selection from Genesis and Development of a Scientific Fact, Chap. 4 (sections 4 and 5).
  • Holiday: May 1

    No Class

  • No Reading.
  • Week 4: May 10, 5th period, in 9-316

    Conjecture and refutation: Popper

  • Reading: Popper, selection from Conjectures and Refutations, Falsificationism as demarcation.
  • Further Reading: Peter Godfrey-Smith, selection from Theory and Reality, Chap. 4.
  • Week 5: May 17, 5th period, in 9-316

    Scientific change as a two-stage process: Kuhn

  • Reading: Thomas Kuhn, selections from The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Chap. 3 and Chap. 9.
  • Further Reading: Peter Godfrey-Smith, selections from Theory and Reality, Chap. 5 and Chap. 6.
  • Week 6: May 22

    Observation, and realism about scientific entities

  • Reading: Ian Hacking, selection from Representing and Intervening, Chap. 11, Microscopes.
  • Week 7: May 29

    Conceptual entities: What is a disease? (I)

  • Reading: Georges Canguilhem, A Vital Rationalist, Chapter 14: The Normal and the Pathological (pp. 321-350).
  • Week 8: Jun 5

    Conceptual entities: What is a disease? (II)

  • Reading: Georges Canguilhem, A Vital Rationalist, Chapter 15: Normality and Normativity (pp. 351-384).
  • Week 9: Jun 12

    Realism about psychological entities

  • Reading: Ian Hacking, selection from The Social Construction of What?, Madness: Biological or Constructed?
  • Week 10: Jun 19

    Bayesianism and new theories of evidence

  • Reading: Peter Godfrey-Smith, selection from Theory and Reality, Chap. 14.
  • Further Reading: Ian Hacking, selection from An Introduction to Probability and Inductive Logic, Chap. 7.
  • Week 11: Jun 26

    The Golem, I

  • Reading: Golem, Introduction and Chap. 2.
  • Week 12: Jul 3 (Writing topic due)

    The Golem, II

  • Reading: Golem, Chaps. 1 and 3.
  • Week 13: Jul 10

    The Golem, III

  • Reading: Golem, Chaps. 4 and 5.
  • Week 14: Jul 17 (Writing assignment due)

    The Golem, IV

  • Reading: Golem, Chaps. 6, 7, and Conclusion
  • Week 15: Jul 24

    General Conclusion

  • No Reading.